The Personal Website Of  SP Singh
 

 

 A Window To Perceptive Journalism

 

 

 
 

Keeping up the high voltage reporting in the aftermath of the passage of SYL canal blocking bill, here is the piece that I filed two days after the Termination Act was passed. By this time, I had access to the legal advice documents.

 
 
     

 

 

 

sp singh


home

columns

spice of politics
people
this land of ours

ballot field

across radcliffe

punjab's religio-politics

cinema~books~life

archives

three lines at a time

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Newspapers always excite curiosity. No one ever lays one down without a feeling of disappointment."
Charles Lamb, 1833


"Frankly, despite my horror of the press, I’d love to rise from the grave every ten years or so and go buy a few newspapers."
Luis Buñuel,
Spanish filmmaker


"I often wonder what future historians will say about us. One sentence will suffice to describe modern man: he fornicated and he read newspapers."
Albert Camus,
French novelist, dramatist, philosopher, 1956

How CM's Team Legal found
an enabling loophole

S P Singh

Chandigarh: 

PUNJAB's legal team poring over 'Operation Termination' to knock out the premise of the Supreme Court judgement requiring Punjab to hand over the SYL construction agency to a Central agency found its job made simpler by something as simple as the failure of the Darbara Singh Government in early-1982 to put the Agreement before the cabinet or execute it in the name of the Governor. 

Amarinder Singh was pleasantly surprised when the legal team, which he said was headed by former Attorney general Soli J. Sorabjee, tendered its most crucial piece of advice – that the 1981 Agreement signed by the Chief Ministers of Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan was "neither expressed to be made by the Governor … nor executed on his behalf. Hence the Agreement is not under Section 299 of the Constitution." Had it been, the Bill could not have found its way to the Punjab Assembly. 

Article 299 says: "All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a state shall be expressed to be made by the President or Governor … and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor."  

Legal advice documents, accessed by The Indian Express, reveal an interesting aspect which was discussed: Will the earlier Central Government notification of 1976 come into effect immediately if the Assembly terminated the 31.12.1981 Agreement? Sources said in the talks with the Prime Minister and discussions with Central Government officials and legal hawks within the AICC, this question was repeatedly raised. "We had done our homework well. In fact, this issue was debated at length," said a legal team member.  

"Although the Tribunal decision is under Section 5 (2) of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 is not binding upon the State for want of the Gazette publication under Section 6 of the Act 1956. But as a proposition of the law laid down therein, it is, to the extent it holds by reason of merger no part of the 1976 Award, and the Award completely lost its identity and existence with the termination of the 1981 Agreement," the written legal advice to the Government said.  

It said the order/award of 1976 cannot survive automatically unless the Central Government acquires the power to pass fresh orders under Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966. Any such move, however, was politically fraught with dangers of high-decibel protests as this Section 78 is the target of ire of all political parties of Punjab. 

"In law, the 1976 Award cannot revive once it automatically ceased to exist by reason of variation and merger with the 1981 Agreement. It has been so held by the Supreme Court in B.N. Tiwari Vs Union of India – 1965 (2) SCR 421:AIR 1965 SC 1430." In the B.N. Tiwari case, a carry forward rule of 1952 was substituted by a Rule made in 1955. The 1955 Rule was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1964. "In the 1965 Tiwari case, the apex court held that after striking down of the 1955 Rule, the Rule of 1952 which already ceased to exist by reason of its substitution of the 1955 Rule did not survive automatically," Punjab's legal team concluded. 

 

The litmus tests

Following are the litmus tests cited by Punjab's legal team by which it said the validity of the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act 2004 will be tested in any judicial challenge "as held in the case of AIR 1976 SC 2250 – In Saksena Vs State of MP."

-- Whether the Legislature, enacting the validating Act, has competence over the subject matter.

-- Whether by validation, the Legislature has removed the defect which the courts had found in the previous law

-- Whether the validating law is consistent with the provisions of part III of the Constitution

 

 

July 14, 2004

Also See:

Govt plans legislation to escape SYL
Govt mulled tweaking 131-yr-old Act for SYL 
CM to meet Sorabjee today 
Punjab annuls all Ravi-Beas pacts...
My days numbered, said CM 
SYL: Centre's eyes were wide shut 
Experts say Punjab Act dilutes riparian concept 
Capt plays to the gallery, works the back-channels
Capt finds solace in Narmada Tribunal’s report
State suggested Presidential Reference
'Presidential Reference is good news'
Capt changes tune
Amarinder demanded this in '87

Print this article

 

 
 


Just a Little Miffed

A few years ago, Time decided to run a cover story on racial tension across America. Racial tension being then particularly bad in Chicago, it was obvious that the Chicago bureau chief (Murray Gart) must play a crucial part in the operation. And indeed, spurred by numerous telephone calls and telex messages from his superiors in New York, the Chicago bureau chief rose heroically to the occasion.

In the 72 hours before his deadline, he managed to interview everyone who had any relevance to racial tension in Chicago politicians, police chiefs, Civil Rights activists. He even penetrated the notorious Blackstone ghetto and gained access to Black Power leaders never interviewed by a white journalist before. During his investigation, he was beaten up, his car was vandalised, his home and family were threatened. But he persevered and got his magnificent story.

'Send us everything,' his editors in New York commanded. In a further burst of Herculean energy, the bureau chief filed 15,000 words of poignant, gripping copy. 'It's great!' his New York editors told him. 'We may have to cut it just a little.'

Time, that week's end, devoted almost its entire issue to racial tension across America. When their Chicago bureau chief looked, the only reference to his story was one sentence: 'In Chicago the situation was much the same.'

(Source: Philip Norman, Awful Moments)

 
 
 

 

 

SP Singh's Blog  

 

 

 



 


Grapevine

 
   
 

Contact me

 


spsingh@penmarks.com



 

 
 

SP Singh's
Fav Newspaper Reads

 
 


People everywhere confuse what they read in newspapers with news. But, if words were invented to conceal thought, newspapers are a great improvement of a bad invention.  Click on any below to find out:


New York Times
The Washington Post
The Guardian

The Telegraph

Beirut Daily Star
Boston Globe
Moscow Times
The New Yorker
Al-Ahram Weekly
Arab News
Dawn
Al Jazeera
The Hindu
The Indian Express
The Asian Age
The Tribune

 
     
 

SP Singh's Fav Blogs

 


The Corner
The Free West
Political Animal
Three Quarks
Sounds and Fury
The Reading Experience
Counter Punch
Exquisite Corpse

 

 

 

     
Home     Latest Column     SP Singh's Columns     Spice Of Politics     People     This Land Of Ours     Ballot Field     Across Radcliffe     Punjab's Religio-Politics

     
Cinema~Books~Life    
Three Lines At A Time     Guest Column     Glossary     Archives     Grapevine    SP Singh     Contact     Search     Site Index     Site Map     Feedback


      © 2006       All rights reserved        Site design by Big Ideas